But if that's the case that would mean OP asked EP for a count while he was considering his action. Things get murky if the floor rules that EP cutting out the call before the count actually doesn't constitute a call. Since he didn't there should be only two options:Ī) Roll the hand back to the turn and deal a new river once action is completedī) Let the hand stand and return unbet chips to EP If he doesn't pull them back or do anything else indicating that he's not all in and action is on him, I'd be inclined to say 'action offered and accepted' if OP went all-in at some point. By that time he should have pulled his unbet chips back. The verbal declaration of 'call' should be binding which means we should proceed to the turn with EP first to act. Why should action be on EP? He cut out a call and after hero asked for a count and EP moved his chips forward for that, the following happened: 'I thought they were all in and said “call” and set out a stack of green' When count is requested, slides chips out, but doesn't pull them backĪction should be on EP, but dealer runs the board. Just thought I’d see what you all thought.ĮP - Calls, with some left over. But was this an angle on the players part? I fully believe if I lost the lot they would have let me pay off their whole stack. They got their money back.Īgain, I know I didn’t protect myself here. The floor was called and there was nothing to do. When I went to collect the pot, the player then stated that they never went all in.

Here’s where it goes off the rails: the dealer runs the board as if the EP player was all in. But, I thought they were all in and said “call” and set out a stack of green. I know I should have clarified, was the player all in or not. In all the commotion, the players stack remained passed the betting line. The EP player cuts out a call and I ask for a count on both stacks. Flop is T9x hh EP limper bets, I raise, button shoves. Straddle pot, 2 players limp, I pot with 99 in the HJ.

Real cash online poker games